Frequently asked questions
As we transition into this new and exciting economic paradigm, we receive many questions. Here are some of the most common ones.
FAQ
What is a Technocratic Resource-Based Economy
A technocratic resource-based economy (RBE) is a proposed system where all resources are declared the common heritage of humanity, and production/distribution is managed scientifically by technical experts rather than through money, barter, or politics. It aims to eliminate scarcity, waste, and environmental damage by using high-tech automation and renewable energy to achieve abundance.
What are the risks of a global resource-based economy not being achieved?
If we fail to transition to a resource-based model, the alternative is a technological dictatorship or total ecological collapse. The RBE is not a "utopia," but the only logical next step for a high-tech civilization that wants to survive.
Will we run out of resources?
Reality is shaped by constraints. Human ingenuity is paramount if the human species is to prosper amid constraints. No matter the supply of resources, humans will find a way to continue, for better or worse. Our relationship with resources will continue to undergo fluctuation as we discover new materials, mineral combinations, and energy sources. While there are pragmatic limits to what can be achieved, The Venus Project remains confident that humans can build a better way of life, in one form or another, free from the many woes of the human condition and modern civilization.
What is the United Nations view on this economic model?
A spokesperson for the United Nations states it is imperative that the discussion on democratically planned economies continues, with a particular focus on engaging in thorough comparative analysis. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of this economic model in relation to other economic models is crucial for identifying potential synergies and areas for further development. By fostering dialogue and collaboration among proponents of different democratically planned models, we can strive towards a higher synthesis that integrates the most persuasive elements of different approaches. This ongoing discussion holds the key to developing more robust and adaptive economic systems capable of addressing the multifaceted potentials and challenges of the 21st century while remaining true to democratic principles, economic efficiency, and social and environmental sustainability. Hopefully, this will also help to build a broader movement capable of overcoming capitalism as an inherently limited system, in addressing the pressing social and environmental challenges of our time.
What are the steps to transition
The "Transition Plan" is the most debated topic within Technocratic circles. While some "Collapse Technocrats" believe the price system must fail entirely before people accept a technical government, the
Transitionists argue for a proactive, three-stage "phase-in" to prevent unnecessary suffering and environmental damage.
This plan is often called the "Functional Bridge."
Stage 1: The Parallel Infrastructure (The "Shadow" System)
Instead of trying to "take over" the government, Technocrats suggest building the new system inside the old one.
- Energy Accounting Pilot Zones: Setting up local communities or industrial parks that trade in energy units and track carbon internally, ignoring the dollar.
- Open-Source Standardization: Creating the Multinational-style blueprints for maglevs, modular housing, and automated farms now. By the time the old system fails, the "blueprints for survival" are already tested and ready to deploy.
- The Talent Migration: Encouraging engineers, doctors, and logistics experts to form "Functional Guilds"—essentially the early versions of Functional Sequences—outside of traditional corporate structures.
Stage 2: The "Emergency Decree" (The Shift in Logic)
Transitionists argue that as the climate or economy worsens, the public will demand "expert solutions" over "political promises."
- The Suspension of Debt: A key part of the plan is a "Debt Jubilee." Since money is a social construct, it can be deleted. In this stage, all mortgages and debts are cleared, and the focus shifts to maintaining
Physical Supply. - Functional Mobilization: The government (or what's left of it) hands over the "keys" of essential infrastructure (power, water, food) to the Service Sequences. This is where "Price" is removed from life-essentials.
- The First Energy Dividend: To prevent chaos, the system begins distributing a basic energy allowance to every citizen, ensuring that even as the "stock market" dies, people can still eat and have power.
Stage 3: Geographic Consolidation (Forming the Technate)
Once the essential services are stabilized, the map is redrawn.
- Abolishing Political Jurisdictions: States, provinces, and counties are dissolved and replaced by Regional Divisions ($1^\circ$ longitude/latitude).
- The Regional Division Councils take over: The local guilds that were formed in Stage 1 become the official Local Organizations for those coordinates.
- The Global Link-up: The separate Technates connect their ledgers to the World Government's carbon tracking system, officially launching the Global Resource Board.
The "Peaceful" vs. "Chaos" Transition
Technocrats argue that a "managed" transition is the only way to save the environment because:
1. Capitalism requires growth: It cannot stop consuming resources even if it wants to.
2. Technocracy requires balance: It is the only system designed to run in a "Steady-State."
The "Functional Strike" Concept
One radical transition plan involves the Functional Sequences themselves. If the engineers who run the power plants and the logistics experts who run the food supply simply decided to stop accepting money and started following the Energy Accounting model, the Price System would evaporate overnight. This is called a "Functional Strike"—not to stop working, but to stop working for profit.
How can I be an advocate for change?
To advocate for change and for the transition from capitalism to an RBE, you can engage in education, direct action, and community-building. This involves participating in existing movements, challenging capitalist norms, and contributing to an alternative economic model such as the one proposed.